WebAug 1, 2003 · J. Gross, O. John. Published 1 August 2003. Psychology. Journal of personality and social psychology. Five studies tested two general hypotheses: … WebGross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality …
To Reappraise or Not to Reappraise? Emotion Regulation …
WebGross & John 9/03 The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire is designed to assess individual differences in the habitual use of two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Citation Gross, J.J., & John, O.P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for WebMar 11, 2015 · Predictors ER. The 10-item ERQ (Gross and John, 2003) was used to examine the use of two regulatory strategies: CR and ES.Respondents indicate their tendency toward reappraisal (six items) and suppression (four items) through a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from one (strongly disagree) to seven (strongly agree).Independent … mjネット四国
Validity and reliability of emotion regulation questionnaire
WebMar 12, 2003 · According to Gross's (1998, Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299) process model of emotion regulation, strategies that act early in the emotion-generative process should have a different profile of consequences than strategies that act later on. This review focuses on two commonly used strategies for down-regulating emotion. WebFactor analysis of 2 groups, male college students and VA patients, shows a very large factor accounting for most of the variance. The factor is interpreted as overall quality of drawing and is unrelated to gross adjustment of the VA patients. WebBackground. Dr. Gross was born and raised in Omaha, NE where he obtained his Bachelor’s, Master’s, Medical Degree and completed Anatomic and Clinical Pathology … algeria città